COBIT self-assessment guide using COBIT / Subjects: COBIT (Information technology management standard) · Information technology > Evaluation. The COBIT PAM adapts the existing COBIT content into an ISO An alignment of COBIT’s maturity model scale with the international standard Assessor qualifications and experiential requirements .. (COSO Guidance ). ISACA has designed and created COBIT® Self-assessment Guide: Using COBIT ® 5 (the ‘Work’) primarily as an assessor . The Measurement Framework.
|Published (Last):||1 November 2008|
|PDF File Size:||17.23 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.19 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
We will quickly review the key elements of each of these activities. Resources and information necessary for performing the process are identified, made available, allocated and used.
Holdings: COBIT self-assessment guide
Work products are reviewed and adjusted as necessary to meet the requirements. Share buttons assesspr a little bit lower. This figure is reproduced from ISO: The assessor then reaches a conclusion as to ocbit extent to which the attribute has been achieved. Reporting the Results The results of the assessment are analysed and presented in a report Uslng report also covers any key issues raised during the assessment such as: There is effective communication between parties and clear assignment of responsibilities.
Explain the assessment purpose, scope, constraints, and model. The guide will, said ISACA, provide information on how to undertake a formal assessment by a trained certified assessor. Evidence of process capability may be more abstract than evidence of process performance. In some cases, the evidence of process performance may be used as evidence of process capability. Ensure that the data collected is correct and objective and that the validated data provides complete coverage of the assessment scope.
Process Attribute Rating For each process assessed, a rating is assigned for each process attribute up to and including the highest capability level defined in the assessment scope The rating is based on data validated in the previous activity Traceability must be maintained between the objective evidence collected and the process attribute ratings assigned For each process attribute rated, the relationship between the indicators and the objective evidence is recorded Establish and document the decision-making process used to reach agreement on the ratings e.
Work products are produced that provide evidence of process outcomes, as outlined in section 3.
Detailed discussion of the process for a compliant assessment is provided in an Assessor Guide. If correct, the next page will load with a graphic first — these can be used to check.
ISACA publishes COBIT process assessment model
Collect evidence of process performance for each process within the scope. The plan, including the assessment schedule and logistics for site visits is reviewed and approved. The assignment of a rating for a given Process Attribute needs to be supported by objective, validated evidence. Is performance of the process adjusted to meet plans? Requirements for documentation and control of the work products are defined.
Ensure that the staff members understand what is being undertaken and their role in the process. This attribute is fully achieved when the process achieves its defined outcomes. Have requirements for documentation and control of the work products been defined?
ISACA publishes COBIT process assessment model – Infosecurity Magazine
In addition, simplified guidance has been developed in a Self-assessment Xobit to completing assessments for those wanting to perform a simple, judgement based self assessment as a precursor to azsessor more formal compliant assessment.
Initiation Identify the sponsor and define the purpose of the assessment: Input Process Output Brief the organisational unit on the performance of the assessment: Are work products appropriately identified, documented and controlled?
Process objectives have been defined. Collect evidence of process capability for each process within the scope. Which processes are being assessed? Interfaces between the involved parties are managed to ensure effective communication and clear assignment of responsibility. Requirements for documentation and control of the work products have been defined.
aseessor Define how the assessment data will be collected, recorded, stored, analysed and presented with reference to the assessment tool. The report also covers any key issues raised during the assessment such as observed areas of strength and weakness and findings of high risk.
ISACA’s COBIT® Assessment Programme
An outcome is an artefact, a significant change of state or the meeting of specified constraints. Responsibilities and authorities are defined, assigned and communicated. With COBIT defining 34 generic processes to manage IT — complete with process inputs and outputs, key process activities, process objectives, performance measures and a simple maturity model — PAM is billed as an aid to security management.
Present the assessment schedule. Finalise the assessment report and distribute to the relevant parties. The sponsor identifies who will approve the assessment plan. REVEAL Process results or performance Management of work products of the process Management of the process performance Definition of the process Deployment of the process Measurement and control of the process Innovation and optimisation of the process Lets take a look at a couple of these in a little more detail so you can get a sense for what they mean.
Custom Statutory Programs Chapter 3.
They represent a common starting point for assessment, which increases the consistency of assessor judgment and enhances the repeatability of the results. Guude areas of coblt and weakness Findings of high risk, i. Recall, it is highly unlikely an enterprise would assess all 34 COBIT processes, so a scoping tool kit has been provided, see next slides for outline and scoping example. What constraints, if any, apply to the assessment?
Briefing The assessment team leader ensures that the assessment team understands the assessment: For each process assessed, assign a rating to each process attribute. Potential risk factors and mitigation strategies are documented, prioritised and tracked through assessment planning.
Are resources and information necessary for performing the process identified, made available, allocated and used? Prepare the assessment report. Define the planned outputs of the assessment. Answer any questions or concerns that they may have. For each process, relate the evidence to defined process indicators.