Copenhagen has ratings and reviews. But in his Tony Award- winning play Copenhagen, Michael Frayn shows us that these men were passionate. In Michael Frayn’s Copenhagen, a fictional account of an actual event during World War II, two physicists exchange heated words and profound. A review, and links to other information about and reviews of Copenhagen by Michael Frayn.
|Published (Last):||8 August 2018|
|PDF File Size:||4.99 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.97 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
His works often rais Michael Frayn is an English playwright and novelist. After hearing the reviews from England, was fortunate enough to catch it at Broadway about a month after it first opened.
Sep 11, Paul Ataua rated it really liked it. Interesting subject, first act was much better than the second, I thought the author was trying too hard to make quantum mechanics match the possibilities of what happened at Bohr’s home. Even someone with only a passing familiarity with the story will enjoy this.
I know that this play is beloved by everybody, but I struggled with it. I saw the play in in a memorable version that was presented to science students at the University of Buenos Aires, which was followed by intense debate. It opened on Broadway at the Royale Theatre on 11 April and ran for performances.
Historical thoughts on Michael Frayn’s Copenhagen | Restricted Data
View all 5 comments. It needs actors to make it not feel dry. This is the order they appear in the script:.
I don’t want to see him working hard and learning more about plutonium than most people will ever know in their lifetimes. But Heisenberg was a patriotic German who was now working, probably with some reluctance, under the Nazis; Bohr, who was half-Jewish, would InGerman physicist Werner Heisenberg made a clandestine trip to have dinner with his friend, Danish physicist Niels Bohr, and his wife, Margrethe.
Archived from the original on 10 December Jan 13, Laura rated it really liked it Recommends it for: The Americans ended up for various reasons thinking it could be done; the Germans thought it was not worth the risk and expense.
Please copenagen improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Sep 04, Nicki rated it liked it Shelves: The answer almost certainly lies in the gray area between those possibilities, and it’s that ambiguity in Heisenberg’s mind and character that Copenhaben so eloquently explores, both in his play and in a long, expansive bibliographical essay that lays out many of the uncertainties in Heisenberg’s motivations and the factors that led him to seek out Bohr for that last disastrous conversation that might have had such a tremendous impact on world history.
Feb 18, Gumble’s Yard rated it really liked it Shelves: Looking for the answers they never found in life. Of course, this is a work of fiction and Frayn knows nothing about quantum mechanics, but still In it, he related his final evening copenahgen Bohr as very pleasant and unremarkable: You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2. I didn’t think he’d be able to pull it off, but it worked.
Imchael read it aloud to my husband.
But enjoyed your thoughtful take on the subject, as always. Of course, there are limits to this sort of attitude. But above all they were human, with all the requisite failings and ambiguities, and when considered as such they become so much more fascinating — which is why I picked up Co I’m kind of fascinated by the history of science, in particular by the lives of the various actors involved.
Along the way, Heisenberg and Bohr “draft” several versions of their exchange, arguing about the ramifications of each potential version of their meeting and the motives behind it. Kramers George Uhlenbeck Rudolph Peierls. Perhaps the author wishes to leave it to the interpretive will of the director but I think this a mistake. While books can help me enter the world of the story, and temporarily leave my own life, being a theatre buff c If you’re into stuff like this, you can read the full review.
Copenhagen – Michael Frayn
This blog began in Frayn’s cunning conceit is to use the scientific underpinnings of atomic physics, from Schr? Copenhagen is a play by Michael Fraynbased on an event that occurred in Copenhagen ina meeting between the physicists Frany Bohr and Werner Heisenberg. They were two of the absolute best scientists in their field—this was the same Heisenberg who had formulated the Uncertainty Principle—and they had challenged each other to do some of their very best work.
We acknowledge and remind and ckpenhagen you that copenhagenn may, in fact, be entirely unrepresentative of the actual reviews by any other measure. I think there is too much license given to the mind to make for a good idea of ranking this as a stage act. But it might appear to give an one of those questions that people have been asking since